Saturday, December 31, 2005

Stockbroker Fraud


The Law Offices of Zilinskas & Woosley specializes in recovering investment dollars lost as a result of stockbroker fraud, negligence, churning, overconcentration, unsuitable investments, margin trading, sale of B shares and lack of supervision.

The Law Offices of Zilinskas & Woosley currently have cases pending against Prudential, Salomon Smith Barney, UBS, Wells Fargo, Oppenheimer, Bank of America, A.G. Edwards and Brookstreet.

If you have suffered significant losses in your brokerage account contact the Law Offices of Zilinskas & Woosley www.zwsecuritiesfraud.com today for a free, no obligation, confidential analysis.

Wednesday, December 28, 2005

Will and Trust Contests


A will or trust contest is exactly what the term implies—a challenge to the validity of a document purporting to be decedent's last will and testament (or a codicil). The 'contest' may occur either before or after admission of the will to probate.

Generally--any 'interested person' may contest. Whether raised before or after the will is admitted to probate, a will contest may be pursued by 'any interested person.’ The Probate Code defines 'interested person' broadly to include a decedent's spouse, registered domestic partner, children, heirs, testate beneficiaries, creditors, and 'any other person having a property right in or claim against' a trust or estate which may be affected by the proceeding.

The Code expressly states the meaning of 'interested person' may vary. Whether a particular person is 'interested' is to be determined on a case-by-case basis, according to the particular purpose of the proceeding and the particular matter involved.

Under case law, the general rule is that the will or trust contestant must have an interest of a pecuniary nature which may be impaired or defeated by probate of the will or benefited by setting it aside (such as an heir or legatee under a prior will).

Case law has recognized standing in the following persons:

Heirs at law: Any person who would succeed to any portion of the estate if decedent had died intestate (without a will) has standing to contest a testamentary document which would defeat or impair that intestate interest.

Pretermitted heirs: Decedent's children, spouse, and registered domestic partner, although omitted from the will (or other 'testamentary instrument'), may have claims to a 'statutory share' of the estate as 'pretermitted heirs.'

Beneficiaries under earlier will: The beneficiaries under an earlier will, whose interests are impaired or defeated by a later will offered for probate, have standing to contest the later will.

Beneficiaries under later will: Conversely, if the interest of a beneficiary under a later will may be impaired or defeated by probate of an earlier will, the beneficiary has standing to contest probate of the earlier will.

Creditors of heirs: An heir's creditors may have an 'interest' in the estate if decedent's will disinherits the debtor-heir. However, such creditors have standing to file a will or trust contest only if they have perfected a judgment lien at the time the property would pass to the heir if the will were set aside. Conversely, an heir's general unsecured creditors (no judgment lien) apparently have no standing to file a will contest.

Executor under earlier will admitted to probate: The executor appointed under a will, duly admitted to probate, has an affirmative obligation to defend that document against subsequent contests.

Proposed executor under will offered for probate: A person designated by decedent to be executor has no 'duty' to defend a contest before admission of the will to probate and his or her appointment as executor.

Assignee or estate of proper contestant: The right to contest a will survives to the contestant's estate; similarly, it is assignable. Hence, a proper contestant's assignee or a deceased contestant's estate representative has standing to pursue the will contest in the original (assigning or deceased) contestant's place.

'Direct contest': A 'direct contest' is a pleading in a court proceeding alleging the invalidity of an instrument (or one or more of its terms) based on any of the following grounds:

Revocation
Lack of Capacity
Fraud
Misrepresentation
Menace
Duress
Undue Influence
Mistake
Lack of Due Execution
Forgery


If you believe that you have lost your inheritance based on any of the above, contact the Law Offices of Zilinskas & Woosley at www.zwlegal.com to discuss your options. Remember, in these types of cases there is a very limited time in which to intiate a challenge.

Monday, December 26, 2005

Los Angeles Female Firefighter Discrimination


The Law Offices of Zilinskas & Woosley filed suit against the City of Los Angeles for discrimination against a female firefighter. The suit was brought on behalf of a female firefighter who had been subjected to the same physical tests as the male recruits at the academy and had excelled in all respects. The suit alleges that despite meeting or exceeding all of the requirements to be a firefighter she was subjected to disparate treatment, including punishing physical tests that the male recruits were not subjected to, in an effort to destroy her career. A copy of the suit can be obtained from the Law Offices of Zilinskas & Woosley www.zwlegal.com.

Historic Santa Barbara Courthouse


The Law Offices of Zilinskas & Woosley has the pleasure of practicing before all Courts in the State of California (both State and Federal) including at the historic Santa Barbara Courthouse pictured above.

Chicago Title Company Lawsuit


The Law Offices of Zilinskas & Woosley filed suit against Chicago Title Company on behalf of the purchasers of a 1000 acre ranch. It is alleged that Chicago Title missed an easement running across the buyers property and refused to adequately compensate the buyers for the loss in value of their property due to the missed easement. This type of lawsuit is known as insurance bad faith since an insurance company (in this case a title insurance company) has a duty to investigate claims and compensate its insureds for the value of the loss.

Moreover, it is alleged that Chicago Title intentionally obtained an artificially low appraisal to reduce the amount it owned to its insureds and, discovery has revealed that this is part of a pattern of practice enaged in by Chicago Title. If proven, this will subject Chicago Title to punitive damages.

If you have a title insurance claim, or believe that your title insurance company is refusing to adequately compensate you for a claim, you should immediately contact an attorney. www.zwlegal.com